 |
|
|
I Was a Sunday-School Spy
NONE of the written accounts of the crucifixion in the New Testament
say anything about Jesus being nailed to the cross.
When confronted with this, almost all of the participants were surprised.
Why the difference in the modern-day written accounts versus the original
written accounts?
-
People today are fundamentally different – not likely
-
Not an important aspect of the crucifixion – therefore, left out in
original accounts. If this is true, then why is it emphasized so much today
(i.e. “His pain, your gain”) and why did every modern-day writer include it?
-
Neglected to include it. How can this be true for all four written
accounts (presuming they were from different writers), while none of the
modern-day accounts neglected to include it?
-
Some of the original accounts may have been based on hearsay and not
personal witness. True – but all of the modern-day accounts are definitely
based on hearsay.
Is
it possible the modern-day perceptions of the crucifixion are different from
the original event?
|
|
 |
Useful services: 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9